Be that as it may, I am clearly missing the entire idea of this entry, which is to give my ideas about what the prompt actually... prompts us to think about: environmental responsibility vs. personal freedom. On the one hand, if the environment is screwed, we kind of are too. But on the other hand, it would be somewhat undesirable to live in a state-run, Orwellian, fascist totalitarian society.
I am of the personal opinion that these two necessities—sustaining our planet and preserving our individual freedoms—can fairly easily be balanced. Regardless of how I feel about Michael Pollan and his... corny theories (oh my, a pun!), he admittedly makes some good points in his novel, which I definitely might have read. We live our lives and produce and consume our food according to various systems. Sure, the government could forcibly impose a particularly eco-friendly system on our lives, and ultimately, it would probably benefit the environment a great deal. However, I don't believe that the mandate of such a system is crucial or even necessary for Earth's survival. It just takes a little bit of common sense and responsibility on the parts of the citizens of the world.
--Wald der Männlich